Comparison among Soil Taxonomy (2014), WRB (2014), and WRB (2022) Systems on Anthropogenic Soils in Korea

نویسندگان

چکیده

The remodeling agricultural land in South Korea is an anthropogenic soils created by reclaimed dredging generated from the Four Major River Restoration Project. area of ??the remodeled 7,727 ha, and many are located near Rivers. Soils made artificially human activities differ natural soil terms development as well properties. Thus, this study attempted to classify using 3 classification system 1) Soil Taxonomy, 2) WRB (2014), 3) (2022). Inchang series, a land, fine, mesic family Anthroportic Udorthents for Taxonomy. (2014) recognized Spolic Urbic Technosols (Siltic, Anthraquic, Gleyic, Transportic) (2022) classified Stagnic Gleyic Transportic). Taxonomy limited understanding properties because it categorizes into subgroups. On other hand, classifies Anthrosols RSG, continuously revises accurate soils. Therefore, necessary revise Korean according revised classification. Furthermore, suitable soil, create referring Taxonomy.Results series Udorthent,

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparing soil taxonomy and WRB systems to classify soils with clay-enriched horizons (A case study: arid and semi-arid regions of Iran)

     Comparing the ability of ST and WRB systems to describe soils with clay-enriched horizons was the aim of the present research. In arid and semi-arid regions of Iran, two study sites were considered. Three pedons at each study site were selected, described and sampled. Soils were classified based on ST (2014) and WRB (2015) systems. The micro-morphological investigations were done to confir...

متن کامل

مقایسه سامانه های رده بندی آمریکایی و جهانی در توصیف ویژگی های برخی خاک های مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک ایران مرکزی

One of the main objectives of soil classification systems is to identify the differences of soil properties for management purposes. In this study, the efficiency of American and WRB soil classification systems were compared in order to describe some of soil physical, chemical and mineralogical properties in arid and semiarid regions of central Iran. Khatoon-Abad and Mobarekeh plains as arid re...

متن کامل

Construction of an Yucatec Maya soil classification and comparison with the WRB framework

BACKGROUND Mayas living in southeast Mexico have used soils for millennia and provide thus a good example for understanding soil-culture relationships and for exploring the ways indigenous people name and classify the soils of their territory. This paper shows an attempt to organize the Maya soil knowledge into a soil classification scheme and compares the latter with the World Reference Base f...

متن کامل

Comparision of fertility capability and taxonomic classification systems to classify the soil map units in some parts of Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari province

Although fertility capability classification (FCC) has high performance in land evaluation and soil maps interpretation, so far it has been less attended in land evaluation studies. Therefore, qualitative (FCC method) and quantitative (Riquer index) land fertility capability evaluation for Wheat and Rice cultivation and comparison of Soil Taxonomy and WRB classification with FCC were chosen as ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Han-guk toyang biryo hakoeji

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['2288-2162', '0367-6315']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7745/kjssf.2023.56.1.068